Admissibility of the Defendant’s Criminal Records at Trial
نویسنده
چکیده
The jury trial, which is a hallmark of the Anglo-American adversary system, requires close attention to the evidence that it is permissible for the lay jurors to hear. No evidentiary issue has proved more contentious than the admissibility of witnesses’, especially defendants’, prior criminal history because of concern that the lay jurors might prejudicially infer present guilt from past criminality. This article explains the complex evidentiary rules for admitting criminal history to prove guilt and to impeach witness credibility. It suggests that inquisitorial trial procedure, which historically has been unconcerned that judges know about the defendant’s prior criminal history while they are determining present guilt may have to restrict admissibility of such evidence as lay juries become more common.
منابع مشابه
Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and On Trial Outcomes
This Article uses unique data from over 300 criminal trials in four large counties to study the relations between the existence of a prior criminal record and defendants testifying at trial, between defendants testifying at trial and juries’ learning about criminal records, and between juries’ learning about criminal records and their decisions to convict or acquit. Sixty percent of defendants ...
متن کاملCulture, Cloaked in Mens Rea
Proof beyond reasonable doubt of the mens rea or state of mind associated with a particular crime is a requirement for the successful prosecution of all criminal defendants under our system of justice. In the legal jargon, it is part of the prosecution’s prima facie case. Concomitantly, criminal defendants may successfully challenge the case against them on the ground (among others) that the pr...
متن کاملMorality Influences How People Apply the Ignorance of the Law Defense
In four empirical studies, we showed that laypeople apply the ignorance of the law defense differently depending on the perceived morality of the defendant’s course of conduct at the time of the illegal act. Moral and neutral defendants who pled ignorance of the law were afforded leniency, whereas immoral defendants were sentenced as though they were not ignorant, even when defendants in all th...
متن کاملLearning Cost-Effective and Interpretable Treatment Regimes for Judicial Bail Decisions
Decision makers, such as judges, make crucial choices regarding judicial bail decisions on a daily basis. Such decisions typically involve careful assessment of the subject’s (or defendant’s) condition, analyzing the costs associated with the possible actions, and the nature of the consequent outcomes. Further, there might be costs associated with the assessment of the subject’s condition itsel...
متن کاملThe Role of Doctors in the Pre-Trial
The activities of the criminal justice system began with the commission of the crime and tries to social order is restored and the victim is entitled to the right with the transition from the stages of exposure of a crime, prosecution, investigation, trial and execution of the sentence. Throughout the steps above, the steps taken in the exposure of a crime, prosecution, primarily investigation ...
متن کامل